Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2017

Supreme Court Decision Alert - June 19, 2017

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Due Process—Specific Personal Jurisdiction
  • Trademarks—First Amendment

Due Process—Specific Personal Jurisdiction

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., No. 16-466

The due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments govern whether and when courts may exercise "personal jurisdiction" over a defendant by adjudicating claims against it. A defendant is always subject to personal jurisdiction in its home state, under so-called "general" jurisdiction; when general jurisdiction is unavailable, "specific" jurisdiction allows a court to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant when the defendant's acts within or relating to the forum state create a sufficient connection between the forum, the defendant, and the claim. Today, the Supreme Court held that a court may not exercise specific jurisdiction over the claims of plaintiffs whose

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from