Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2013

Supreme Court Decision Alert - February 20, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Federal Jurisdiction—Legal-Malpractice Claims Involving Patent Disputes

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today (February 20, 2013) the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Federal Jurisdiction—Legal-Malpractice Claims Involving Patent Disputes

Gunn v. Minton, No. 11-1118

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over any suit arising under federal patent law. Today, in a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court held in Gunn v. Minton, No. 11-1118, that this jurisdiction does not extend to state-law claims for legal malpractice that raise questions of patent law. The decision reverses a decision of the Texas Supreme Court, and also abrogates contrary holdings by the Federal Circuit in Air Measurement Technologies, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, L.L.P., 504 F.3d 1262 (Fed. Cir. 2007), and Immunocept, L.L.C. v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., 504 F.3d 1281 (Fed. Cir. 2007).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from