Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2022

Snap Back – Snap Removals Must Have Complete Diversity Or Face Remand

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed so-called "Snap Removals" in the case of In re Levy, 52 F.4th 244, 245 (5th Cir. 2022).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed so-called "Snap Removals" in the case of In re Levy, 52 F.4th 244, 245 (5th Cir. 2022). In Levy, the plaintiff, Calvin Levy, petitioned the Fifth Circuit for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to remand the suit to state court for want of jurisdiction.

The suit arose from a traffic collision. Levy is a citizen of Louisiana, as is the driver of the other vehicle, defendant Emile Dumesnil. At the time of removal by diverse defendant Zurich American Insurance Company, neither Dumesnil nor defendant Dynamic Energy Services International, LLC, had been served with process.

Levy initiated the suit in Louisiana state court against the three defendants. Zurich-the only defendant that had received service of process-promptly removed to federal court, asserting that removal was proper under28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2), otherwise known as the "forum-defendant rule." That statute provides that an "action otherwise

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from