Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

PODCAST · 23 APRIL 2026

Seventh Circuit Roundup: Two Opinions Every Civil Litigator Should Read

The Seventh Circuit issued two landmark decisions in early 2026 that fundamentally reshape civil litigation practice. One establishes that strategic choices at summary judgment constitute waiver rather than forfeiture, foreclosing appellate review even when counsel changes hands. The other applies the Supreme Court's recent Hippocratic Medicine framework to organizational standing, potentially ending the diversion-of-resources theory that advocacy groups have relied upon for decades.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Seventh Circuit recently issued two decisions — one in mid-February 2026, one in early March — that together touch nearly every corner of civil practice. One is a cautionary tale about appellate waiver. The other reshapes what it means for an organization to have standing in federal court.

Tabernacle Church v. Church Mutual: When Waiver Is Final

The facts are straightforward and sympathetic. A small Indiana church suffered a devastating fire. Its insurer paid roughly $1.7 million — the actual cash value of the damage — but the policy contained a replacement cost provision that could have entitled the church to significantly more, conditioned on repairing or replacing the damaged property "as soon as reasonably possible after the loss." Disputes about repair scope dragged on for years, no repairs were started, and eventually the church sued.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from