Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2012

Second Circuit Rejects Application of RICO to Foreign Criminal Enterprises

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The US Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. NAB created a sea change in private securities litigation by sharply limiting the extraterritorial application of the securities laws while employing language suggesting skepticism of extraterritoriality more generally.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Previously published on February 8, 2012.

Keywords: private securities litigation, RICO, extraterritoriality, exchange act, foreign criminal enterprises

The US Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Morrison v. NAB created a sea change in private securities litigation by sharply limiting the extraterritorial application of the securities laws while employing language suggesting skepticism of extraterritoriality more generally. Since then, the lower federal courts have been reevaluating the extraterritorial applicability of other statutory causes of action, including Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) cases.1 The Second Circuit's recent decision in Eligio Cedeño v. Castillo, 10-3861-cv (2d Cir. Jan. 24, 2012) (Summary Order), continues the post-Morrison trend of limiting the extraterritorial reach of statutes creating private rights of action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from