Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2018

Second Circuit Joins Sister Circuits In Holding Party-Appointed Arbitrators Not Subject To Same Disclosure Requirements As Neutral Arbitrators

The Second Circuit recently held that parties seeking to vacate awards under Federal Arbitration Act Section 10(a)(2) must satisfy a higher burden in showing evident partiality by a party-appointed

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Second Circuit recently held that parties seeking to vacate awards under Federal Arbitration Act Section 10(a)(2) must satisfy a higher burden in showing evident partiality by a party-appointed arbitrator. The parties arbitrated a workers compensation reinsurance dispute and the losing party (Lloyds) moved to vacate the ultimate arbitral award on the ground that the prevailing party (ICA)'s selected arbitrator displayed evident partiality by failing to fully disclose his connections to ICA. The lower court vacated the award, finding that ICA's appointed arbitrator's undisclosed relationships were "more significant, more numerous, and involve[d] more financial entanglements" than would be acceptable, particularly in light of the "apparent willfulness" of the non-disclosure.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from