Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2025

Second Circuit Joins Judicial Trend: No VPPA Violation In Pixel-Sharing Case

Loeb & Loeb LLP
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Contributor
Loeb & Loeb LLP

Loeb & Loeb LLP

Loeb & Loeb LLP is a multi-service law firm with more than 400 lawyers focusing on select core...

View firm profile
Explore more from Loeb & Loeb LLP

he Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a proposed class action against Flipps Media (now Triller TV), ruling that the company did not violate the federal Video Privacy Protection Act...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of a proposed class action against Flipps Media (now Triller TV), ruling that the company did not violate the federal Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) by sharing user video-viewing data via tracking pixels. The court concluded that the data shared did not qualify as "personally identifiable information" under the VPPA because it could not be used by an ordinary person to identify an individual or their viewing habits. In other words, the panel found that the statute's focus supports a reading that only data that an ordinary person could recognize as a video title should be covered. 

This decision aligns the Second Circuit with other courts that apply a stricter "ordinary person" standard for what constitutes identifiable information under the statute. The Second Circuit panel observed that both the Third and Ninth Circuits have interpreted the VPPA's ban on disclosing personally identifiable information as

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from