Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 DECEMBER 2017

Putative Class Member's Spoliation Of Evidence Disqualifies Him As A Class Representative

The defendant moved for sanctions based on spoliation of evidence.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A district court recently disqualified a plaintiff from acting as a class representative because his spoliation of evidence rendered him an atypical class member. The plaintiffs allege that casting sand used in creating Jeep Wrangler engine parts seeps into the vehicles' radiators, creating a sludge that causes heating and cooling issues. During discovery, the defendant, which manufactures Jeep Wranglers, requested one of the putative class representatives to "[w]ithin 90 days... [produce] YOUR VEHICLE for a private inspection . . . at an . . . authorized dealership chosen by YOU."

Between that request and his response, the plaintiff, at his counsel's request and without notice to the defendant, took his vehicle to an unaffiliated automobile service location and had the coolant in his radiator flushed – a service that was not required to operate his vehicle. Following the service, the plaintiff received two unlabeled, unsealed jugs of liquid that purportedly came

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from