Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2019

Pennsylvania Still Flailing Away In The Jurisdictional Deep End

Last year, we posted about Pennsylvania going off the personal jurisdictional "deep end" in Hammons v. Ethicon, Inc., 190 A.3d 1248 (Pa. Super. 2018),

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Last year, we posted about Pennsylvania going off the personal jurisdictional "deep end" in Hammons v. Ethicon, Inc., 190 A.3d 1248 (Pa. Super. 2018), and Webb-Benjamin, LLC v. International Rug Group, LLC, 192 A.3d 1133 (Pa. Super. 2018). Well, unfortunately they're still at it, and we're afraid that the result could well be a lot like the Missouri talc cases, or a bunch of California mass torts – a lot of futile trial activity eventually coming to naught because the trial courts never had jurisdiction to start with.

But maybe not. Here's a ray of hope. Last Wednesday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal in the Hammons case. So whether or not it ultimately takes the United States Supreme Court to straighten Pennsylvania out, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will have the first opportunity to set things right – which is as it should be.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See more popular content from