Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 OCTOBER 2020

Online Reviews Are Not "Newly Acquired Evidence"

We have blogged about class actions; we have blogged about preemption; we have blogged about social media; we have blogged about alleged economic loss...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

We have blogged about class actions; we have blogged about preemption; we have blogged about social media; we have blogged about alleged economic loss; and we have blogged about alleged product defects—endlessly. Rarely, however, have we blogged on all of these topics in a single post.

Today is the day, and the topic is an order dismissing a class action in the District of Connecticut. It all came together in favor of the defendant in a well-reasoned order in Ignacuinos v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 3:19-cv-672, 2020 WL 5659071 (D. Conn. Sept. 23, 2020). The plaintiffs alleged that they and a class of patients like them used the defendant's COPD inhalers, but received only about half of the doses than what the labeling represented. Id. at *2-*3. This initially appears to be a typical economic loss class action—a bunch of people who claim they got less than they paid for. There was, however, a twist. These plaintiffs also alleged physical harm in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See more popular content from