Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2018

Observations: Three Weeks After Supreme Court's SAS Institute Decision

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Anyone reading this post is likely well aware that on April 24 the Supreme Court put an end to the PTAB's practice of instituting inter partes review (IPR) on less than all claims challenged in an IPR petition...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Anyone reading this post is likely well aware that on April 24 the Supreme Court put an end to the PTAB's practice of instituting inter partes review (IPR) on less than all claims challenged in an IPR petition in SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu.  See  Supreme Court: No More Partial Institution Practice in AIA Reviews.  It is certainly too soon to identify any reliable trends in the PTAB's handling of new institution decisions in the wake of the SAS decision.  In fact, it is quite likely that the PTAB is still itself trying to evaluate how the SAS decision will affect its ability to institute IPR proceedings at the same rate it had prior to the Supreme Court decision.  Nonetheless, a review of the new institution decisions entered by the PTAB since the April 24 SAS decision proves interesting for at least two reasons.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from