Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 DECEMBER 2015

No Panacea: Proportionality Under New Rule 26(b)

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

On December 1, very significant changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure went into effect. After nearly five years of work and debate, the new rules have debuted with both fanfare and trepidation.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On December 1, very significant changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure went into effect. After nearly five years of work and debate, the new rules have debuted with both fanfare and trepidation. One of the most interesting changes is the incorporation of "proportionality" in Rule 26(b).

In drafting the new Rule 26(b), the Committee moved five proportionality factors (that had been all but buried in a subsection) front and center and added a sixth factor. The Committee Note states that courts were not using the proportionality limitations as originally intended and noted their intent to "emphasize the need for active judicial use of [the proportionality factors] to control excessive discovery."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from