Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JULY 2022

Ninth Circuit Weighs In On Section 1782 Issue That Has Split Federal Courts

As we've previously written (most recently here), 28 U.S.C. § 1782 is a useful federal statute that allows overseas litigants to obtain discovery through U.S. federal courts...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

As we've previously written (most recently here), 28 U.S.C. § 1782 is a useful federal statute that allows overseas litigants to obtain discovery through U.S. federal courts for use in the overseas litigation. With respect to adjudication of Section 1782 applications, some federal courts have disagreed about whether such are "dispositive" or "non-dispositive" matters when the application is decided by a federal magistrate judge, as opposed to a federal district judge. The distinction is relevant because federal district judges review magistrate judges' reports and recommendations on "dispositive" matters de novo, but review magistrate judges' rulings on "non-dispositive" matters only to determine whether the ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from