Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2022

Ninth Circuit Interprets FOSTA Restriction On Section 230 Narrowly

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

On October 24, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act shielded Reddit Inc. from liability under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPA).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On October 24, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act1 shielded Reddit Inc. from liability under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPA).2 The court considered the text of a 2018 amendment to Section 230, known as the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA),3 which created a carve-out to Section 230's broad protections by allowing victims to bring claims against platforms that aided in their trafficking. The Ninth Circuit held that the FOSTA exception does not apply where a provider does not "knowingly benefit" from such trafficking.4 This is the first time that a federal court of appeals has interpreted how broadly the FOSTA exception to Section 230 applies.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from