Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2020

Never Too Much Of A Good Thing

Well, at least that's true when we are blogging about defense wins. And this week, we have another good gadolinium case. This time from New York.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Well, at least that's true when we are blogging about defense wins. And this week, we have another good gadolinium case. This time from New York.

Just a quick reminder – gadolinium is a contrast agent that is injected into a patient before undergoing an MRI. The gadolinium is intended to pass through the body, but there are known risks of retention in patients with impaired kidney function.

Plaintiff in Sabol v. Bayer Healthcare Pharm, Inc., 2020 WL 705170, *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2020) underwent a remarkable 23 MRIs between 2007 and 2015, and each time she was injected with a gadolinium contrast agent. As in our other recent gadolinium posts, plaintiff here had normal kidney function. Her lawsuit, therefore, hinges on her contention that defendants should have warned of the risks of gadolinium retention in patients with normal kidney function.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See more popular content from