Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 OCTOBER 2023

Narrow Search Terms Lead To Sanctions In COVID-19 Case

Earlier this year, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled on a case involving the adequacy of search terms in concordance with Federal Rules 26 and 34.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Bradley C. Whitecap
Bradley C. Whitecap
Author LinkedIn connections

Earlier this year, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled on a case involving the adequacy of search terms in concordance with Federal Rules 26 and 34. The plaintiffs in Gardner-Alfred v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, No. 22-CV-01585 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 2023)claimed that they were improperly denied religious accommodations under COVID-19 vaccination requirements of their employer.

During discovery, the plaintiffs missed multiple discovery deadlines during a contentious document production period, which included the plaintiffs running very narrow search terms that were not agreed upon by the parties. The case discusses the plaintiffs' discovery obligations under Federal Rules 26 and 34, and the court's reasoning for imposing sanctions upon them for their discovery violations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See more popular content from