Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MARCH 2014

Massachusetts Court Refuses To Certify Case Involving Alleged Independent Contractor Misclassification

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently issued a case involving the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently issued a case involving the straight-forward application of the Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011), to a class-wide independent contractor dispute.

In Magalhaes v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., Civil Action No. 13-10666-DJC (Mar. 10, 2014), the Lowe's home improvement chain hired independent contractors to install products sold at its stores, including countertops, roofing, flooring, and window treatments.  Each of the contractors worked under essentially the same form independent contractor agreements.

The plaintiff worked for Lowe's installing window treatments such as blinds.  He had his own business, called "Shades in Place", hired his own employees, and had two vehicles to assist in performing the installations.  He could turn down Lowe's work, and could also perform work for other customers.  He brought suit under Massachusetts

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from