Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2012

Magistrate Judge Peck's Message To The Bar: Predictive Coding Should Be "Seriously Considered"

Ediscoverylawreview.com first discussed this emerging issue in its blog post on February 15, 2012.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Ediscoverylawreview.com first discussed this emerging issue in its blog post on February 15, 2012. As anticipated, Magistrate Judge Peck issued an opinion detailing his reasons for authorizing the use of predictive coding in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Group, No. 11-CV-1279 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2012). Judge Peck's position on predictive coding can be summarized by a single statement in his Opinion: "What the Bar should take away from this Opinion is that computer-assisted review is an available tool and should be seriously considered for use in large-data-volume cases where it may save the producing party (or both parties) significant amounts of legal fees in document review."

As Judge Peck noted, this Opinion appears to be the first wherein the Court approved predictive coding. He emphasized that while manual document reviews are still considered the "gold standard," studies have shown that "computerized searches are at least as accurate, if not more so, than manual

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from