Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2018

Lucia Decision Means Remand Not A Set-Aside Of The Judgment

An investment advisor could not convince the D.C. Circuit that the recent Supreme Court decision in SEC v. Lucia meant an end to his legal troubles

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Timothy Belevetz is a Partner in the Washington D.C. office and a Partner in the Tysons office

An investment advisor could not convince the D.C. Circuit that the recent Supreme Court decision in SEC v. Lucia meant an end to his legal troubles. Instead of setting aside an SEC administrative law judge (ALJ)'s multi-million dollar judgment against the investment advisor and his firm, the D.C. Circuit remanded the case back to the agency for a new hearing before a different ALJ.

In its June 2018 Lucia decision, the Supreme Court found that the way in which the SEC appointed its administrative law judges was unconstitutional and, accordingly, that the hearings over which they presided were unconstitutional. In November 2017, while the case was pending before the Supreme Court, the SEC undertook to fix the defective appointment process by having the appointments of all of its then-current ALJs ratified by the commissioners themselves and requiring all future ALJs to be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from