Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JULY 2024

Litigation After The Demise Of Chevron Deference

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Contributor
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

In an increasingly global and interconnected world, Hughes Hubbard sets itself apart as a robust...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

July 15, 2024 – As widely anticipated, the Supreme Court last month overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.,1 which directed federal courts to defer to an administrative...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

July 15, 2024 – As widely anticipated, the Supreme Court last month overruled Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.,1 which directed federal courts to defer to an administrative agency's "reasonable" interpretation of ambiguous terms in a Congressional statute authorizing the agency to act. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo,the Court held by a 6-3 vote that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires Article III judges to interpret ambiguities in statutes without regard to reasonable agency interpretations, consistent with the general primacy of Article III courts in declaring and interpreting federal laws. A ringing dissent by Justice Kagan (joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson) decried the dismantling of the modern U.S. administrative state that they asserted the death of Chevron deference would trigger.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from