Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2025

Juries For Takings Liability: Treating Litigants Alike

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contributor
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt is a multidisciplinary, integrated national professional services firm known for quality and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

The right to trial by jury has long been accepted as a foundational part of Anglo-American law. The Supreme Court has called it "the bulwark of American liberties" ...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

INTRODUCTION

The right to trial by jury has long been accepted as a foundational part of Anglo-American law. The Supreme Court has called it "the bulwark of American liberties"2 and a cornerstone of our system of justice.3 Blackstone praised it as "the glory of the English law."4 John Adams called it "the heart and lungs" of liberty.5 Thomas Jefferson concluded that trial by jury was "the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution."6 More recently, constitutional scholar Akhil Reed Amar concluded that "[n]o idea was more central to our Bill of Rights ... than the idea of the jury."7 And, lest we forget, one of the explicit charges in the Declaration of Independence justifying our split with England was "[f]or depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury."8 Take a poll of lawyers and the odds are strong that most will tell you they would prefer trying their cases to juries rather

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from