Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 AUGUST 2022

International Arbitration Experts Discuss ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Alex Lawrence contributed to Mealey's International Arbitration Report, which asked industry experts and leaders for their thoughts on ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Alex Lawrence contributed to Mealey's International Arbitration Report, which asked industry experts and leaders for their thoughts on ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd., in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that Section 1782 discovery is available only for governmentally authorized foreign proceedings, resolving a circuit split and excluding discovery for ad hoc or private commercial arbitrations.

“The Court's decision appears, at least in part, motivated by the fact that the parties opted for and consented to arbitration,” Alex wrote. “The parties could have resolved their dispute before a court, but they chose to arbitrate. Arbitrations are meant to be faster and more efficient, which is often inconsistent with broad and costly U.S.-style discovery. Thus, when they signed up for arbitration, the parties should have known that they were not getting access to U.S. federal courts and broad document discovery and depositions.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from