Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2021

How Are Appellate Panels Selected (Part 2 Of A 4 Part Post)

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

With this post, we begin our short review of some of the academic literature regarding panel effects.Of course, the first question one encounters when taking a case before an appellate court is...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

With this post, we begin our short review of some of the academic literature regarding panel effects.

Of course, the first question one encounters when taking a case before an appellate court is how one's panel will be chosen. A majority of appellate courts state, either in their operating procedures or their rules, that appellate panels for argued cases are assigned randomly. This assumption has been built into most of the analytics work done on panel effects for at least a generation.

But is it really true? I have spoken with lawyers in several federal circuits who are dubious about just how random assignments are.

Let's begin by making several things thoroughly clear: no one is suggesting that panels are intentionally chosen to manipulate results in particular cases (although disappointed litigants have done so once in awhile). Further, reasonable people could dispute just how beneficial random assignments are. There are any number of good reasons to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from