Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2011

Fourth and Ninth Circuits Deepen Split Over Deadline for Removal When Defendants in Multi-Defendant Case Are Served at Different Times

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b), defendants may remove a civil case from state to federal court if the case originally could have been filed in federal court and if the notice of removal is filed within 30 days after the receipt by the defendant of a copy of the initial pleading or the service of summons.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published February 7, 2011

Keywords: Removal deadline, federal court, first-served defendant, last-served defendant, multi-defendant, Barbour, Destino.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b), defendants may remove a civil case from state to federal court if the case originally could have been filed in federal court and if the notice of removal is filed within 30 days after the receipt by the defendant of a copy of the initial pleading or the service of summons. However, courts disagree on how this 30-day deadline applies in multi-defendant cases when different defendants were served on different days.

Most circuits that have considered the issue follow the last-served-defendant rule, under which each defendant gets its own 30-day window to file a notice of removal, with earlier-served defendants permitted to join in any subsequent notice of removal. The Fifth Circuit, by contrast, has adopted a first-served-defendant rule, under which the 30-day clock starts

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from