Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2017

For It's One, Two, Three Strikes and Prisoner Suits (Might Be) Out

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

Congress may have intended some or all of these results, or Congress may not have considered them at all.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This is the third and final post in a series examining the effect of inmate litigation on federal dockets. (See the first two articles here and here.)

The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), enacted by an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote to respond to the prisoner "litigation explosion,"1 has reduced the number of prisoner suits.   But more than twenty years later, federal dockets remain loaded with inmate litigation. Forty percent of the Fifth Circuit's docket is occupied by prisoner suits – about ninety percent of which are unsuccessful. My last article explored an under-utilized tool to deter frivolous prisoner claims: the Spears hearing; another such tool is the "Three Strikes Rule," codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from