Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MAY 2026

Food Delivery Drivers Misclassification Suit Can Proceed In Court

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision addressing whether transportation workers who never cross state lines can be exempt from mandatory arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the U.S. Supreme Court held on May 28, 2026, that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can be exempt from arbitration under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do.

Background

The case, Flowers Foods, Inc. et al. v. Brock, is the latest in a line of cases addressing the scope of Section 1 of the FAA, which exempts from arbitration disputes involving "contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce." 9 U.S.C. § 1.

 In New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, 586 U.S. 105 (2019), the Supreme Court held that "contracts of employment" includes independent contractor agreements. In Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, 596 U.S. 450 (2022), the Court held that an airline worker who loaded and unloaded cargo fell within Section 1's exemption even though she did

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from