Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2011

First Line Of Defense In Privacy Class Actions - Damages

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Named plaintiffs in privacy class actions ordinarily do not or cannot allege injury or loss resulting from the misuse or theft of their private information.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Law360, New York (September 22, 2011, 12:57 PM ET) -- Named plaintiffs in privacy class actions ordinarily do not or cannot allege injury or loss resulting from the misuse or theft of their private information. As demonstrated by recent court decisions in California and New York, the inability to allege damages continues to pose significant obstacles for would-be class plaintiffs. Such was the case for the plaintiffs in In re Google Street View, No. 10-MD-02184 JW (N.D. Cal.). There, the court dismissed plaintiffs' claims under California's consumer protection statute, Business & Professional Code § 17200 ("Section 17200"), because plaintiffs failed to plead facts showing that Google's alleged collection of their Wi-Fi usage data caused plaintiffs to lose or expend money.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from