Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2016

Fee Award Denied To Litigation Funding Firm

The Court of Chancery recently denied a fee award to a litigation funding firm in the decision of Judy v. Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 4662-VCL (Del. Ch. Sept. 19, 2016).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Chancery recently denied a fee award to a litigation funding firm in the decision of Judy v. Preferred Communication Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 4662-VCL (Del. Ch. Sept. 19, 2016). There, Vice Chancellor Laster denied an equitable fee award on multiple grounds:

  1. Movant gratuitously financed the litigation brought by plaintiff, and as a voluntary financier, movant cannot seek an equitable fee award;
  2. Movant financed plaintiff's attempt to take over the company, and case law has held that a movant cannot obtain an equitable fee award under such circumstances;
  3. Movant cannot establish the necessary causal connection between its litigation financing and the value of the licenses; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from