Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JUNE 2010

District Court Rules on Stranger-Initiated Annuity Transactions

On June 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island ruled on motions to dismiss in a series of cases brought by insurers arising out of stranger-initiated annuity transactions.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Steuart Thomsen
Steuart Thomsen
Brian Spahn
Brian Spahn
Phillip Stano
Phillip Stano

Originally published June 4, 2010

On June 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island ruled on motions to dismiss in a series of cases brought by insurers arising out of stranger-initiated annuity transactions. See Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio v. Conreal LLC, et al., C.A. No. 09-470 (D.R.I. 2010). The court dismissed the insurers' rescission claims against the investor-owners of the annuities, but allowed fraud and certain other claims to proceed against other defendants involved in the sales of the annuities.

The stranger-initiated annuity transaction (STAT) scheme was described by the court as follows, based on the allegations of the complaint:

  • The defendants who sponsored the STAT scheme solicited terminally ill individuals and paid them to sign applications for variable annuities.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from