Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JANUARY 2020

Denial Of Certiorari In DISH Network L.L.C. v. Krakauer

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Explore more from Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

Whether the placement of a phone call in violation of the TCPA is, without further allegation or showing of injury, sufficient to show an Article III concrete injury under Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Issue

Whether the placement of a phone call in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the "TCPA") is, without further allegation or showing of injury, sufficient to show an Article III concrete injury under Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.1

Background

Plaintiff Thomas Krakauer filed a putative class action suit against DISH Network in 2011, seeking statutory damages for phone calls allegedly placed to him and approximately 18,000 others in violation of the TCPA. Krakauer sought to certify a class of all those whose numbers were listed on the Do-Not-Call Registry, and who received telemarketing calls from Satellite Systems Network promoting DISH satellite services between May 1, 2010 and August 1, 2011.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from