Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2015

Delaware Superior Court Cuts Punitive Damages In Transvaginal Mesh Case

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Last week, we posted about a $10 million award of punitive damages in a product liability action against a manufacturer of hip implants.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Last week, we posted about a $10 million award of punitive damages in a product liability action against a manufacturer of hip implants.  We explained our view that the award was excessive, in part because hundreds of similar cases are pending across the country.

We've also been following a much larger set of cases against medical device manufacturers—those involving injuries allegedly resulting from the use of surgical mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. An astonishing 85,000 cases against surgical mesh manufacturers have been centralized for pre-trial proceedings in federal district court in West Virginia, and thousands of additional cases have been filed in state courts.  As may be inevitable with so many turns of the Roulette wheel, a few plaintiffs have hit the jackpot.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from