Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2019

Decision In Yashtinsky v. Walmart, Inc. (W.D. Ark.)

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Explore more from Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

Whether plaintiff had alleged a sufficiently "concrete" injury for standing under Article III.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Issue

Whether plaintiff had alleged a sufficiently "concrete" injury for standing under Article III.

Background

Plaintiff Kevin Yashtinsky received a two-part text message on his cell phone from Walmart, inviting him to enroll in Walmart Pharmacy's prescription messaging program. Yashtinsky responded by filing a putative class action lawsuit against Walmart, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") and claiming damages, injunctive relief, and any other available legal or equitable remedies. In his complaint, Yashtinsky claimed that he was not a Walmart customer, that he was not enrolled in Walmart's prescription messaging program, and that the text messages were sent en masse.36 Yashtinsky argued that the unsolicited text messages were an aggravation, a nuisance, and an invasion of his privacy. He further argued that the receipt of the messages wasted data on his cellphone, that it temporarily reduced computing power on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from