Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2007

Court Holds Attorney-Client Privilege Doesn’t Cover Messages Sent From Client’s Work E-Mail

A recent Supreme Court of New York decision has held that e-mails between an employee and his attorneys sent using the employer's e-mail system are not privileged.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kenneth Rashbaum
Kenneth Rashbaum
Dina Richman
Dina Richman

A recent Supreme Court of New York decision has held that e-mails between an employee and his attorneys sent using the employer's e-mail system are not privileged. The decision in Scott v. Beth Israel Medical Center, Inc. 2007 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 7114 (Oct. 17, 2007), may, if left standing, call into serious question the wisdom of using a healthcare employer's e-mail system by employees seeking to send privileged or otherwise sensitive communications.

Scott

Decision

The Scott decision arose from an underlying breach of contract dispute. The plaintiff, Dr. W. Norman Scott (physician for the New York Knicks until 2005), had been named chairman of the hospital's Department of Orthopedics in 1998. He was terminated from his employment with Beth Israel (BI) in 2004. Dr. Scott's contract stated that he was entitled to $14 million in severance pay if his termination was without cause. BI refused, contending that he was, in fact, terminated for cause. Dr. Scott brought suit alleging breach of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from