Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2011

Court Decision Alert - March 22, 2011

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, No. 09-1156 (previously discussed in the June 14, 2010 Docket Report).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published March 22, 2011

Keywords: Securities Exchange Act, materiality, Fair Labor Standards Act, oral complaints

Today the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

  • Securities Exchange Act—Materiality
  • Fair Labor Standards Act—Retaliation—Oral Complaints

Securities Exchange Act—Materiality

Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, No. 09-1156 (previously discussed in the June 14, 2010 Docket Report).

Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 provide that a business may be held liable for failing to disclose a material fact when disclosure is necessary to make statements regarding the purchase or sale of securities not misleading. Today, the Court issued a unanimous decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, No. 09-1156, reaffirming that a particular fact is material "'when there is a substantial likelihood that the disclosure of the omitted fact

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from