Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 SEPTEMBER 2016

Contemplating Cross-Appeals – When "Winners" Need To Appeal

One preservation issue that seems to receive less attention than it should is the potential need for a cross-appeal.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

One preservation issue that seems to receive less attention than it should is the potential need for a cross-appeal. An appellee/respondent who is not entirely successful in the trial court may challenge an unfavorable portion of a final judgment or order by filing a cross-appeal. Indeed, the cross-appeal is typically the sole means that an appellee/respondent has to request relief from the order or judgment appealed by the appellant. Thus, it is the method for the partial or nominal winner below to challenge an unfavorable portion of an otherwise favorable final judgment or order.

One should also remember that even a favorable judgment may include adverse interlocutory rulings, such as the erroneous admission or exclusion of significant evidence. A cross-appeal accordingly may be necessary to correct the error for purposes of any new trial in the event that the appellate court reverses a favorable final judgment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from