Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2018

Class Certification Denied In Juice Dispute

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Recently, a New Jersey federal district court judge refused to certify a class of consumers claiming an orange juice product was mislabeled as "pasteurized."

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Recently, a New Jersey federal district court judge refused to certify a class of consumers claiming an orange juice product was mislabeled as "pasteurized." In re: Tropicana Orange Juice Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 2018 WL 497071 (D.N.J. Jan. 22, 2018). According to plaintiffs, Tropicana's "Pure Premium" orange juice contained added natural flavoring in violation of FDA pasteurization standards. The court denied the class certification motion because plaintiffs failed to prove that common issues predominated under Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Since multiple named plaintiffs testified that they did not even see the word "pasteurized" on the product label, much less rely on it, class certification was put out to pasture.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from