Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JANUARY 2024

Class Action: Tracking TransUnion's Ongoing Ripple Effects

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

The Supreme Court's 2021 ruling in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez put a renewed focus on "injury in fact" as a key jurisdictional question in class action lawsuits...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court's 2021 ruling in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez put a renewed focus on "injury in fact" as a key jurisdictional question in class action lawsuits—and the ramifications of that decision continue to unfold in litigation.

Citing TransUnion, a number of courts have been extending the focus on concrete injury to the settlements of class action lawsuits—and in many cases, their reviews have led them to invalidate settlements based on plain- tiffs' lack of Article III standing. "Some courts have taken the unusual step of deciding on their own—without either of the settlement parties bringing it to their attention—to rule on the standing issue in the context of a settlement," says Mohamed Awan, a partner in Crowell & Moring's Litigation and Mass Tort, Product, and Consumer Litigation groups.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from