Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 SEPTEMBER 2014

Class Action Suit Against Sunflower Seed Manufacturer Dismissed As Implausible

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Judge Manuel Real of the Central District of California dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit finding the plaintiffs’ claims to be implausible as a matter of law.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent food mislabeling case, Judge Manuel Real of the Central District of California dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit finding the plaintiffs' claims to be implausible as a matter of law. Last year, Judge Real and Judge George Wu dismissed class actions challenging the labeling of food and cosmetics on this same basis. (See December 26, 2013 post.)

In Weiss v. The Kroger Co., No. 2:14-cv-03780, plaintiffs claimed that the label for Kroger Sunflower Seeds was deceptive because it listed the sodium content for the "edible portion" of the product—i.e., the seed, not the shell—which misled consumers into believing they were consuming less salt than they actually were. The claim was based on the premise that sunflower seed consumers generally place the entire seed, including the shell, into their mouths before spitting out the empty shell and, in so doing, they ingest the salt on the shell.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from