Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2017

CBAs Must Specifically State Intent To Arbitrate Statutory Rights

Vasserman, instead of filing a grievance, sued in state court for violation of the California Labor Code, including claims for a failure to pay all regular and overtime wages and a failure....

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Seyfarth Synopsis:   The Court of Appeal has held that unless a collective bargaining agreement includes an explicitly stated, clear and unmistakable, intent to waive the right to a judicial forum for statutory causes of action, arbitration of those statutory claims will not be compelled. Vasserman v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital. The CBA in Vasserman did not waive the right to a judicial forum, because the Grievance and Arbitration section of the CBA failed to specify the Labor Code provisions that would have to be arbitrated. 

The Facts

Tanya Vasserman, a registered nurse, worked for Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital, under a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA") between the Hospital and the California Nurses Association. The CBA's "Grievance and Arbitration Section" provided for grievances culminating in arbitration, and defined a grievance as any dispute "arising out of the interpretation or application of a specific Article and Section of this

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from