Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2020

California Court Concludes That Anti-Arbitration Law Is Likely Preempted

On February 7, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued an order supporting its injunction of Assembly Bill 51.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On February 7, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued an order supporting its injunction of Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51), an expansive anti-arbitration law enacted in October, which was scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2020.1  In its order, the court expressly noted that it was likely that opponents of the bill would succeed on their argument that AB 51 was invalid insofar as it is preempted by federal law.

Under AB 51, employers in the Golden State would be unable to require applicants and employees from waiving any right, forum, or procedure established by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act and the Labor Code, effectively banning mandatory arbitration of employment disputes.  Due to its particular placement in the Labor Code, violation of the law would constitute a misdemeanor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from