Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2017

Avoiding Disputes Over How To Resolve Disputes

In Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. v. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and WSW Acquisition Co., LLC, C.A. No. 12585-VCL (decided Dec. 5, 2016)...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Ira N. Rosner is a partner in Holland & Knight's Miami office.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • In Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. v. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and WSW Acquisition Co., LLC, the Delaware Chancery Court was required to interpret purchase price dispute resolution mechanisms commonly found in agreements for the purchase and sale of privately held companies.
  • The decision provides clear guidance for drafting the purchase agreement so that it does not create ambiguity as to the role of dispute resolution language in the contract.

In Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. v. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and WSW Acquisition Co., LLC, C.A. No. 12585-VCL (decided Dec. 5, 2016), the Delaware Chancery Court was required to interpret purchase price dispute resolution mechanisms commonly found in agreements for the purchase and sale of privately held companies. In this case, Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (the Seller) sold its subsidiary, CB&I Stone and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from