Last month, the Competence Centre Arbitration and Crime,
together with the Basel Institute on Governance, released a toolkit
for arbitrators aimed at helping them to identify and deal with
allegations of corruption and money laundering in international
arbitration.1 Acknowledging that international public
policy increasingly demands attention to these important issues in
arbitration, the toolkit sets out a step-by-step guide to help
arbitrators recognise corruption, investigate it, and consider the
possible consequences for the arbitration going forward.
However, while the toolkit provides a basic framework, the
detail of how each step should be applied is, at times, somewhat
vague. It is evident throughout, particularly with regards to the
choice of law and the burden and standard of proof, that there is
scope for confusion and inconsistency, and that the consequences of
a finding of corruption will largely be left to the
arbitrator's discretion. It is therefore