Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2023

Congress' Goals On UFLPA Implementation & Enforcement

Barnes, Richardson & Colburn
Explore more from Barnes, Richardson & Colburn

The chair and co-chair of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ("CECC") stated their concerns about the implementation and enforcement of Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act...

United StatesInternational Law
Pietro N. Bianchi
Pietro N. Bianchi

The chair and co-chair of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ("CECC") stated their concerns about the implementation and enforcement of Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act ("UFLPA") in a letter earlier this week. Under UFLPA, imports made (in whole or in part) in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China ("XUAR") are presumed to be made from forced labor. This letter outlining the CECC's goals requested actions by both Customs and the Department of Homeland Security's Forced Labor Enforcement Task Force ("FLETF"). The CECC's letter indicates that they are concerned about attempts made to obscure imports connections to forced labor in the XUAR, such as Uyghurs being transferred outside the XUAR for forced labor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

The Lindsey Graham Sanctions Act: What Businesses Need To Know About The New Tariffs

President Trump signed the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act into law on September 18, 2026, establishing mandatory tariffs of up to 500% on Russian goods and up to 100% on goods from countries that continue to buy Russian energy. The Act targets major importers like China, India, and Turkey, with limited relief mechanisms including natural gas exceptions, presidential waivers, and a 270-day winddown period for entities divesting from Russian operations.
GlobalInternational Law
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

Updates On Export Controls Impacting AI & Advanced Computing

The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security issued guidance on May 31, 2026, clarifying licensing requirements for advanced computing items and AI technologies. The guidance maintains export restrictions for entities in certain countries while providing limited relief for data center operators, though questions remain about future regulatory direction. Companies must now strengthen their compliance programs and supply-chain due diligence as BIS continues to prioritize national security
GlobalInternational Law
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Article

New Tariffs And Import Bans: An Update On The U.S.-Canada “Trade War”

The U.S.-Canada trading relationship has reached a critical juncture as both nations implement escalating trade measures, with Canada's counter-tariffs taking effect and the United States responding with unprecedented import bans on Canadian alcoholic beverages, dairy products, and motorcycles. These actions mark a significant expansion of the Trump Administration's use of Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, moving beyond additional tariffs to outright import restrictions. What does this escalation mean
GlobalInternational Law
Cassidy Levy Kent LLP
Cassidy Levy Kent LLP
Article

Update On CAPE Phase 3 Duty Refunds From U.S. Customs And Border Protection

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has announced that importers with court orders for IEEPA duty refunds on finally liquidated entries can begin filing for those refunds starting October 6, 2026, through the CAPE Phase 3 system. This development follows the Supreme Court's February 2026 decision striking down IEEPA tariffs and represents a critical step for importers seeking refunds on entries liquidated for more than 80 days.
United StatesInternational Law
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney