Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2025

The UPC's Approach To Inventive Step

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The UPC Court of Appeal has now provided clear guidance on how the UPC should determine whether a patent involves an inventive step.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The UPC Court of Appeal has now provided clear guidance on how the UPC should determine whether a patent involves an inventive step. This endorses the "holistic" approach, establishing what the invention contributes to the state of the art and then assessing whether the skilled person would (not merely could) have arrived at the claimed invention with a reasonable expectation of success.

Background

Courts of the various EPC countries have different approaches and use different guidelines when assessing whether a patent involves an inventive step under Article 56 EPC. The EPO and the Technical Boards of Appeal apply a "problem-solution-approach," and this is one of several possible approaches in France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden. On the other hand, other jurisdictions, such as Germany and the UK, use other more "holistic" approaches.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from