Blair v. Kawasaki Rail Car, Inc., No. 18-2098,
Courtroom 201
Scott Blair appeals from a final decision from the PTAB finding
the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,700,602 (“the
’602 patent”) invalid as obvious. The ’602
patent is directed to a subway television media system that is
mounted substantially flush with the wall. In determining
that the challenged claims are obvious, the PTAB relied upon four
prior art references. One of those references is Sasao, which
relates to placing a television inside of a custom built cabinet
that creates a flush surface with the television and the cabinet
paneling.
On appeal, Mr. Blair argues that the Sasao reference relates to
an invention that operates in an entirely different environment, a
residence or commercial building, and is intended to achieve an
entirely unrelated goal, hiding the television. Thus, Mr.
Blair argues that the PTAB erred in relying on the Sasao reference
because it is not analogous prior art.