Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2022

SEP Enforcement: Has The Biden Administration Tabled A Revised Policy Statement?

Six months after the Department of Justice ("DOJ"), United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST")...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Six months after the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) issued a Draft Policy Statement on Licensing Negotiations and Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments, the agencies have yet to issue a final statement, and have been silent as to whether or when such a statement may issue.1 The 2021 Draft quickly attracted substantial criticism and has not been included in recent agency updates and speeches.

Following a 2019 Policy Statement which emphasized that owners of standard-essential patents (“SEPs”) may freely seek, and courts may appropriately order, injunctive relief for SEP-infringing products, the 2021 Draft purports to clarify that injunctive relief will seldom be the appropriate remedy.2 This article addresses the 2021 Draft and provides a primer on standards, SEPs, Standards Setting Organizations (“SSOs”), and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from