Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Claim Construction Victory For Client Shire

    On March 23, 2015, District Judge Charlene Honeywell from the U.S. Middle District of Florida in Tampa issued a favorable claim construction ruling for FLH client Shire Pharmaceuticals.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Apple Inc., No. 15-777 (S. Ct. Mar. 21, 2016)

    The Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider the following question: Where a design patent is applied to only a component of a product, should an award of infringer's profits be limited...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Seeing Things Differently: LEADERS Magazine Interview With Co-Founder And Managing Partner, Ed Haug

    Co-Founder and Managing Partner, Ed Haug, spoke to LEADERS Magazine about the firm's expansions of services which include: commercial litigation and strategic counseling; due diligence...
    United StatesLaw Practice Management
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Haug Partners Defeats Indirect Purchasers' Class Certification Motion On Behalf Of Shire Defendants

    On August 21, 2019, Judge Allison Burroughs of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued an opinion and order
    United StatesConsumer Protection
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Clare Et Al. v. Chrysler Group LLC, No. 2015-1199 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 31, 2016)

    The Federal Circuit affirmed the grant of summary judgment of noninfringement from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for two patents...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    High Point SARL v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 2015-1298 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2016)

    High Point SARL ("High Point") appealed a grant of summary judgment dismissing its lawsuit on the grounds of equitable estoppel and laches.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, No. 2015-1251 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 1, 2016)

    Google moved for judgment as a matter of law, which was denied. Following this denial and the ensuing $85 million damages award, Google appealed to the Federal Circuit.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Supreme Court Decision Expected By June 2019 For Argument Made By Haug Partners Attorney Jonathan Herstoff

    On November 27, 2018, Jonathan A. Herstoff presented argument to the United States Supreme Court in Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, No. 17-1094 (U.S.).
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    FTC Orphan Drug Pricing Investigations: What You Should Know

    Amanda Hamilton recently had her article "What Can the FTC Do about Orphan Drug Prices?" published in the Antitrust Health Care Chronicle for August 2017.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Pride Mobility Prods Corp. v. Permobil, Inc., No. 2015-1585, 2015-1586 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2016)

    Inter partes reviews ("IPR") were instituted against two Pride Mobility Products Corp. patents directed to wheelchairs designed to travel over obstacles.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    My Supreme Court Debut: No Room For Nervousness'

    Haug Partners LLP Attorney Jonathan Herstoff recently argued before the United States Supreme Court for Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago et al., No. 16-658 (U.S.), and won in a unanimous vote.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Shire Secures Victory Regarding Privileged Documents In Adderall XR Class-Action Antitrust Suit

    On November 12, 2015, a federal magistrate judge issued an Order sustaining Shire's privilege claims and denying with prejudice Plaintiffs' request to apply the crime-fraud exception to the documents at issue.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Acorda Therapeutics Inc. V. Mylan Pharm. Inc., Nos. 2015-1456 And 2015-1460 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2016)

    The Federal Circuit affirmed two decisions from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware finding that the Delaware court has specific personal jurisdiction over Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Mylan")...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    FLH Client Supernus Prevails At CAFC

    Following a December 8, 2016 oral argument, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit entered a Rule 36 judgment on December 12, 2016...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    USPTO Navigates New Territory In The Wake Of Matal v. Tam

    Ben Natter and Jessica Sblendorio recently had their article regarding the United States Patent and Trademark Office's ("USPTO") response to Matal v. Tam published on IPwatchdog.com.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    In Re: Man Machine Interface Technologies LLC, No. 2015-1562 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2016)

    Man Machine appealed from an ex parte reexamination decision wherein the Patent Trial and Appeal Board upheld an examiner's rejection of seven claims on anticipation and obviousness grounds.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Sport Dimension, Inc. v. The Coleman Company, Inc., No. 2015-1553 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2016)

    The Coleman Company, Inc. appealed a stipulated judgment from the Central District of California, which found noninfringement of Coleman's design patent directed towards "the ornamental design for a personal flotation device."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Navigating An FTC Drug Pricing Investigation

    Antitrust Associate Amanda Hamilton published an article in FDLI's Update Magazine for the January-February 2018 Issue entitled "Navigating an FTC Drug Pricing Investigation
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Haug Partners Defeats Discovery Motions Before The TTAB Because Movant's Counsel Failed To Meet And Confer In Good Faith

    On December 9, 2021, Haug Partners defeated two discovery motions brought by Environmental Manufacturing Solutions, LLC ("EMS") against Fluid Energy Group Ltd.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Supernus Wins Appeal Against Second Generic Challenger To Oxtellar XR®

    Following an August 6, 2018 oral argument, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on September 6, 2018 unanimously affirmed the District of New Jersey's August 15, 2017 ruling ...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners

Showing 1–20 of 175 results

Next
Legal Intelligence Newsletters