Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2024

Secondary Considerations Arguments Precluded By Prior Nexus Testimony

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

On June 6, 2024, the PTAB issued a Final Written Decision concluding claims 1-6 of U.S. Patent No. 8,899,655 B1 ("the '655 patent") unpatentable.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On June 6, 2024, the PTAB issued a Final Written Decision concluding claims 1-6 of U.S. Patent No. 8,899,655 B1 ("the '655 patent") unpatentable. Yita LLC v. MacNeil IP LLC, IPR2023-00172, Paper 70 (PTAB Jun. 6, 2024) ("Decision"). The PTAB also held that Patent Owner, MacNeil Automotive Products LLC, was "collaterally estopped from relitigating the factual issue of the reasons for the industry praise and commercial success." Id. at 109.

The '655 patent relates to a process for manufacturing a vehicle floor tray, such as a floor tray that closely fits the vehicle foot well where it is placed. Representative claim 1, which is the only independent claim challenged, is reproduced below:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from