Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2017

PTAB Denies Untimely Request To Stay Pending Reexaminations

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

At the time of Petitioner's stay request, both reexaminations were very far along.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Chrimar Systems, Inc., IPR2016-01389, Paper 62 (PTAB Sept. 12, 2017), the PTAB denied Petitioner's request to stay two reexaminations of patents that were also the subject of pending IPR proceedings.

In a pair of IPR proceedings filed in July 2016 (IPR2016-01389 and IPR2016-01399), Petitioner challenged two patents owned by Chrimar Systems, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,155,012 and 8,902,760. Id. at 2. During the August 31, 2017 oral argument in the IPRs, Chrimar notified the PTAB that the '012 and '760 patents were the subject of pending reexaminations that had been filed in May and August 2016, respectively. Id. The day after the oral argument, Petitioner emailed the PTAB to request authorization to file a motion to stay the reexaminations. Id. at 2-3.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from