The USPTO has published a final rule changing the claim
construction standard applied during inter partes review (IPR),
post-grant review (PGR), and the transitional program for covered
business method patents (CBM) proceedings before the PTAB.
The final rule replaces the "broadest reasonable
interpretation" standard with the federal court claim
construction standard that is used to construe a claim in a civil
action under 35 U.S.C. § 282(b). This is the same claim
construction standard articulated in Phillips v. AWH
Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en banc), and its
progeny. Additionally, under the final rule, when construing a
claim term in an IPR, PGR, or CBM, the PTAB will take into
consideration any prior claim construction determination that has
been made in a civil action, or a proceeding before the
International Trade Commission (ITC), if that prior claim
construction is timely made of record in that IPR, PGR, or CBM.